PAC Database - Detailed Chemical Data
Chemical Identity
| Chemical | CAS# | UN# | Health Code Numbers | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Di-n-amylamine | 2050-92-2 | 2841 |
14.02
11.01
14.01
4.07
11.00
7.01
|
|||||||||
| Formula | Synonyms | |||||||||||
| C10H23N | DI-N-AMYLAMINE, DI-N-AMILAMINA (DOT SPANISH), DI-N-AMYLAMINE (DOT FRENCH), DI-N-PENTYLAMINE, DIAMYL AMINE, DIAMYLAMINE, DIPENTANAMINE, DIPENTYLAMINE, N-PENTYL-1-PENTANAMINE, PENTYLPENTYLAMINE | |||||||||||
Physical Properties
| Mol Wt | State | MP (°C) | BP (°C) | VP (Hg) | VP (°C) | SG | LEL (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 157.297 | L | 202.5 | 0.153 | 25 | 0.777 |
PAC Values
| PAC-1 | PAC-2 | PAC-3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.041 | 0.45 | 2.7 |
| PAC-1 | PAC-2 | PAC-3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.26 | 2.9 | 17 |
Technical Basis
A review of available sources identified the following: LCLo and LD50 (rat, rabbit) toxicity data for various routes (oral, skin, and inhalation). Data sources were selected according to the hierarchy listed in Table 3.1. Toxicity data were selected according to type of exposure, species, and route according to the hierarchies stated in Sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2 and evaluated using factors in Tables 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4. Inhalation exposures were scaled to 60-minute equivalents using the ten Berge equation (Section 3.3.4). The most preferred species and data type, a rat LCLo, was selected as the TEEL-3 basis. The TEEL-2 and TEEL-1 values were derived according to Table 3.5.
• TEEL-1 = TEEL-2/11
• TEEL-2 = TEEL-3/6
• TEEL-3 = Rat LCLo (63 ppm/240 min)
This review generated TEEL values that are consistent with Rev. 29A*.
• TEEL-1 = TEEL-2/11
• TEEL-2 = TEEL-3/6
• TEEL-3 = Rat LCLo (63 ppm/240 min)
This review generated TEEL values that are consistent with Rev. 29A*.
References
Rat LCLo: American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal., 23(95), 1962 [PMID:13914538]. Retrieved from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Dipentylamine.